Give me an example of how you have changed the direction or view of a specific function/department and helped them embrace a new way of thinking.
Try This Question Yourself
Practice with feedback and follow-up questions
What is this question about
This question tests whether you can influence how another group thinks, not just win an argument or get approval for your preferred solution. Interviewers want to understand how you identified the old mental model, understood why it existed, and helped others adopt a better one in a durable way. For more senior candidates, they are also judging whether the scope of the change matches your level and whether you changed behavior beyond a one-time decision.
Key Insights
- You should make the old view sound reasonable before you explain why it needed to change. If the other function just sounds uninformed or stubborn, you often come across as low-empathy and less credible.
- This is usually not about persuasion alone; it is about diagnosis. Show that you understood the incentives, fears, constraints, or past experiences that made the existing way of thinking attractive.
- Don't stop at 'they agreed.' Explain what actually changed afterward: decision criteria, operating norms, metrics, process, or repeat behavior. Interviewers are looking for durable influence, not a single successful pitch.
What interviewers probe atlevel
Top Priority
At junior level, you are not expected to have formal authority, so the strongest stories show thoughtful influence through preparation, listening, and small experiments.
Good examples
🟢I put together a simple comparison of the current approach and the proposed one, then walked through it with the team and invited concerns so we could adjust the plan together.
🟢Instead of arguing abstractly, I suggested trying the new approach on one small piece of work first, which made it easier for people to evaluate it without a big commitment.
Bad examples
🔴I told my lead that the other group was wrong, and once he backed me they changed their approach.
🔴I kept repeating the recommendation in meetings until the team finally accepted it.
Weak answers depend on positional backup or persistence alone; strong answers show practical, low-authority influence.
Valuable
Example answers atlevel
Great answers
On a recent project, our design team wanted engineering to wait until every edge case was specified before we started implementation. I understood why they worked that way, because they had seen rushed builds create rework before, but in this case it was slowing feedback a lot. I suggested that we split the work into a small first version with the highest-confidence flows, and I put together a simple list showing what was safe to build now versus what still needed design decisions. After we tried that on one feature, the team saw that they could get earlier feedback without losing quality, and they used the same approach on the next couple of features too. What I think changed was not just that one decision, but their view that engineering had to wait for full completeness before meaningful work could begin.
On a small product team where I worked, the product managers always pushed to pack sprints with visible new features and ignored maintenance work, which left engineers firefighting. I sketched a simple three-point rubric (user impact, frequency, and maintenance cost) and volunteered to score a subset of the backlog with one of the PMs for two sprints as a trial. After we presented the scored backlog, the PMs moved a few medium-priority maintenance items up, and we noticed fewer repeat incidents and quicker fixes for small regressions. Because the rubric made the trade-offs concrete, the product team started reserving a fixed portion of each sprint for upkeep and used the same scoring when planning future roadmaps.
Poor answers
I changed the way another team thought about our tickets. They wanted a lot more detail up front, but I felt that was unnecessary, so I pushed back and said we should just start building and figure out the rest as we go. Eventually they agreed and we moved faster after that. It was a good example of getting people to stop overthinking and be more practical.
Question Timeline
See when this question was last asked and where, including any notes left by other candidates.
Late November, 2025
Early July, 2025
Mid January, 2025
Hello Interview Premium
Your account is free and you can post anonymously if you choose.