Tell me about a time when you convinced someone else on another team to reprioritize their work to achieve a common goal
Try This Question Yourself
Practice with feedback and follow-up questions
What is this question about
This question is assessing whether you can influence without authority when another team has different goals, constraints, or incentives. Interviewers want to see how you understood the other side, built a credible case, and drove toward a shared outcome rather than simply pushing your own priority. At higher levels, they also care about whether the scope of the ask and the way you handled tradeoffs match your seniority.
Key Insights
- Conflict here usually is not about personalities; it is about competing priorities, capacity, risk, or incentives. Name those explicitly and show that you explored them before trying to persuade.
- You should not frame success as 'I got them to do what I wanted.' Strong answers show that you connected your need to a common goal, made tradeoffs visible, and found a path that also respected their constraints.
- Do not skip the 'why they said no at first' part. The strongest stories show that you uncovered the real blocker and adapted your approach, rather than repeating the same argument more forcefully.
What interviewers probe atlevel
Top Priority
At junior level, you do not need a huge business case, but you should show that you connected the request to a real shared outcome and made the ask concrete.
Good examples
🟢I explained that without the change, customers in both flows would keep hitting the same confusing error, and I suggested a very small update they could fit in quickly.
🟢I came with a specific ask, the reason it mattered, and what would happen if we delayed it by a week. That made it easier for them to compare it against their existing work.
Bad examples
🔴I told them our team needed their change quickly so we could stay on schedule, and that was enough to show it should be a priority.
🔴I mostly focused on how blocked I was and why it was slowing my task down, because that was the main issue.
Weak answers argue from personal inconvenience or internal schedule pressure; strong answers tie the request to a concrete shared outcome and make the tradeoff easy to evaluate.
Valuable
Example answers atlevel
Great answers
On a recent project, I was building a small reporting feature and found that users were hitting an error coming from a shared service owned by another team. My first instinct was just to ask them to fix it quickly, but when I spoke with the engineer, I learned their team was handling a production issue and could not take a broad change that week. So I narrowed the request to one validation check that would stop the error for both of our flows, and I shared a short write-up showing the exact user impact and how I would handle the testing on my side. That made the work small enough for them to pull in. They made the change two days later, I verified the integration right away, and we were able to release the feature without the workaround I had originally planned. It also helped me learn that with partner teams, a smaller ask tied to a shared user problem is usually much easier to move than a general request for help.
At my last internship, I was helping launch an internal training page for the customer support team, and I needed a few screenshots and workflow details from the operations team to finish it. They were focused on preparing for a big product launch, so at first they kept pushing my request back because my work looked less urgent than theirs. I set up a quick meeting and showed them that if the training page shipped on time, it would reduce the number of questions their team would get during launch week, which would actually save them time. I also made it easy for them by turning my questions into a short checklist and agreeing to use whatever materials they already had instead of asking for new ones. Once they saw it would help their own team during the launch, they moved it up and sent everything over that same day. We finished the page before the launch, and afterward they told me the support team got fewer repeat questions than usual.
Poor answers
I needed another team to update an endpoint my feature depended on, and they did not seem to realize how important it was. I sent them a note saying my work was blocked and followed up a few times because our deadline was coming up. After I copied my lead on the thread, they moved it ahead and got it done that week. It worked out well because I was able to finish my task on time.
Question Timeline
See when this question was last asked and where, including any notes left by other candidates.
Late January, 2026
The focus was in finding common ground, the interviewer focused a lot on mindset and the question does have traps (like convincing your work is important/more valuable). In hindsight, the goal seemed to be assessing all-round thinking outside of single-project context. Interviewer (HM) spent sufficient time to dissect the story inside out, paraphrase and then dig deeper into learnings from the experience, what would you do differently or how would you behave if you were the other party
Hello Interview Premium
Your account is free and you can post anonymously if you choose.